News:

This forum is moving to a new server. The messages you post here from 13 April 2025 on will not be copied to the new server; just the existing messages will be copied. I'll inform you when the transfer is completed. Thank you! Regards, Hardy.

Precision Simulator update 10.181 (1 February 2025) is now available.
Navburo update 13 (23 November 2022) is now available.
NG FMC and More is released.

Main Menu

Engine Performance

Started by United744, Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:21

United744

Hi,

I've been playing with the various engine types, and I'm intrigued by something:

The RB211 doesn't produce as much raw thrust as the PW4000, but it seems more capable at pulling the aircraft, not only during takeoff, but at altitude, too.

If the overall thrust output is lower, how does it appear to result in greater performance? There is clearly something beyond thrust output going on.

I'm also aware the stated thrust is STATIC THRUST. The only thing I can think is the efficiency improves with increasing forward speed.

Hardy Heinlin

If you're referring to EPR for your comparison: RR shows Integrated EPR, PW shows Core EPR. Big difference.

For further details: PSX manual page 522, 523, grey boxes bottom right.

United744

Thanks, but no.

I'm referring to actual aircraft performance at max power.

For example: climbing to FL380 wiith the RR engines at high gross weight, then switching to the PW engines. It is unable to maintain altitude vs. the RR engines, which I found curious.

The RR has good margin for climb, whereas the PW engines required a descent just to maintain speed.