744 Forum

Precision Simulator and so on

Washington DC people?

Post Reply

Page: 1

Author Post
Moderator
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 1513
Location: KTMB
Next stop... DC.

Three days to absorb the fine details of the newly cooked up DO-178 rev C.

Two evenings (Tuesday the 26th, Wednesday the 27th of June) to browse around.

It was twelve years ago that my wife (then girlfriend) and I had a very pleasant meeting with a PS1 fan in DC. And my archive even provided the address. Let's see!


Jeroen
Member
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 567
TONS of stuff in the DC area to see and do, certainly including the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum, but it's probably not open at night... Anyway, a zillion great restaurants and similar facilities. The politicians and lobbyists really know how to live.

--------------
Does your software have to undergo arduous FAA documentation, testing and certification procedures? I don't understand what has to clear such hurdles and what isn't so bad to certify and what doesn't have to be FAA certified. Obviously, things like a rudder drive mechanism modification would have to jump through a lot of "hoops", but what about your products/software?
_______________
Best wishes,

Phil Bunch
Moderator
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 1513
Location: KTMB
Yup, the full FAA monty -- but not yet at levels A or B. As satcom radios are going to be allowed as primary for safety-critical ATC communications, we have to move from D to C, and this requires a lot of work.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178B soon to be replaced by
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178C

Note: the standard rev letter (B, C) has nothing to do with the design assurance level (A..E).


Hoppie
Moderator
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 1513
Location: KTMB
Back to N194UA. Showing photos of the jerry rig with Mickey Mouse alligator clips that made it work would not increase faith in the industry. :twisted: Wires dangling from the flight deck hatch down into the equipment center... and all to get the pilots crystal clear satcom audio without annoying 400 Hz hum. A Radio Shack isolation transformer dangling from the ceiling. It works in practice. Now trying to find out why it should work in theory.


Jeroen
Moderator
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 2218
Quote
Now trying to find out why it should work in theory.

In theory, in a symmetric, balanced wire pair, the inversed hum amplitude and the non-inversed hum amplitude eliminate each other :-)


!-i

Post Reply

Page: 1

744 Forum is powered by UseBB 1 Forum Software